Publications in 2025

Background: Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide and the third leading cause of death and disability combined. Among ischemic strokes, 25 % to 40 % are classified as cryptogenic, with patent foramen ovale (PFO) identified as a potential underlying cause. PFO is found in 25 % of the general population. Despite the significant occurrence of PFO-associated strokes, the associated costs remain largely unexplored.

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the annual economic burden of PFO-associated stroke in the US.

Methods: A cost-of-illness study was performed, encompassing the direct and indirect costs of PFO-associated stroke on both society and the healthcare system. The model adopted a top-down approach and a one-year, US societal perspective. A payer perspective and bottom-up costing approach were included as scenario analyses. Data was obtained by a targeted literature review.

Results: The societal model, assuming 32.5 % cryptogenic strokes, incurs an annual cost of over $1.3 billion in the US, with over $1.0 billion coming from new strokes and over $300 million from recurrent strokes. The majority of the costs are indirect—50 % from productivity losses due to premature death and 27 % from other productivity losses. Direct costs constitute 23 % of the total. From the payer perspective, the annual costs for PFO- associated strokes in the US were estimated at $302 million, with hospitalization costs comprising 44 %, followed by prescriptions and outpatient care at 19 % and 16 %, respectively.

Conclusion: The economic burden of PFO-associated strokes in the US is substantial, exceeding $1.3 billion per year. Different types of medical management or surgical treatments for PFO-associated stroke could lead to gains in both costs and health outcomes.

Background: Chikungunya virus (CHIKV), transmitted through Aedes mosquitoes, has witnessed a global surge in distribution and outbreaks, posing a significant public health threat. This study conducted two systematic literature reviews (SLRs) to examine the socio-economic burden associated with chikungunya.

Methods: Two SLRs were conducted employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 (PRISMA 2020) standards. The SLRs covered electronic databases, grey literature, and bibliographic searches. Inclusion criteria were guided by the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, Study type) framework.

Findings: A total of 34 studies on cost and resource use and 37 studies on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were included. Direct costs, driven by hospitalization, consultations, diagnostics, and drugs, were frequently reported, with significant variability across studies. Indirect costs, mainly attributed to absenteeism, constituted a substantial portion of the total economic burden. HRQoL studies consistently revealed high pain levels and diminished physical functioning among chikungunya patients, particularly in chronic cases, where these impacts persisted for months to years.

Conclusions: This study highlights the significant economic and public health impact of chikungunya, driven by high treatment costs, productivity losses, and chronic disability. Despite the severity of the disease, limited awareness regarding the severity and economic burden, particularly in resource-limited regions, persists. Our findings underscore the need for targeted public health strategies, standardized management approaches, and increased research to better understand the socio-economic burden of the disease and inform effective interventions.

Background: Given their crucial role in vaccine assessment, National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) should be considered in the Regulation on Health Technology Assessment (EU HTAR) to maximize the benefits of the EU HTAR for vaccines. This review and perspective piece identifies the gaps arising from NITAGs potential lack of involvement and proposes strategies for involving them.

Methods: A targeted literature and guideline review was conducted to evaluate NITAGs’ current and future role in relation to the EU HTAR. The impact of the EU HTAR on diverse national HTA frameworks was explored in a three-country case study. Recommendations were developed to leverage strengths and address weaknesses to ensure consistent and cohesive vaccine assessments.

Results: The case study revealed potential overlaps between NITAGs and the EU HTAR, particularly regarding horizon scanning and joint scientific consultations. The involvement of NITAGs in national assessments varies, influencing how well joint clinical assessment reports will ultimately align with and be applicable to individual Member States.

Conclusions: Stronger consideration of vaccines within the EU HTAR and NITAG involvement can streamline assessments, reduce duplication, and improve alignment between European and national processes. Strategic actions, including capacity building and collaborations between NITAGs, are key in facilitating this process.